Student Union
- By Pete Musto
Lawmakers Take Aim at Tenure
Tenure, or guaranteeing a college professor a job for life, is under fire in some U.S. states.
A lawmaker in Missouri, Rick Brattin, has proposed a law that would ban tenure at public universities in Missouri after January 1, 2018. Similar initiatives are underway in Wisconsin and Iowa.
Brattin said he feels the costs of higher education in the U.S. have gotten too high. He calls tenure at public universities “un-American” and an unnecessary cost to taxpayers.
“You cannot tell me that every tenured professor is absolutely doing everything to the fullest extent,” said Brattin, a Republican state representative in Missouri. “So to have a system in place that protects that person with a guaranteed lifetime employment, it works against itself.”
Opponents say ending tenure would cut jobs in higher education and reduce teaching quality.
“Doing away with tenure and cutting state support is a job killer in higher education,” said University of Missouri biology professor Mannie Liscum in a letter to state legislators. “Killing higher education is shortsighted for a state, because our innovation declines, our ability to compete declines and our respect declines."
The track to tenure is long and laborious, and not even half of all college professors achieve tenure. College teachers spend seven or more years proving their teaching abilities and the value of their research. That rank gives them job security and academic protection until they voluntarily retire.
“What people fail to understand is that tenure is one of the important fortifications of American democracy, in that in the areas of arts and sciences and literature, universities are a bastion for intellectual freedom," Joe Gorton, an associate professor of criminology at the University of Northern Iowa, told Inside Higher Education. "When tenure ends, the politically powerful or economic elite can control what goes on in universities.”
Blogger and educator John Warner, who penned a column titled, "End Tenure, Before It's Too Late," argues that tenure has lost its way by creating a two-tiered system in higher ed. Only professors with tenure enjoy protection on academic freedom, he writes.
"We all agree tenure is important, maybe even necessary, except that somewhere around half of all faculty now don’t have access to tenure," wrote blogger John Warner in Inside Higher Education, "and therefore do not have those protections."
The National Education Association (NEA) agrees that tenure needs revision.
"Colleges and universities also need to do a better job of setting concrete goals, evaluating successes and failures, and talking plainly to the public about them," it wrote on its website. "Professors who have tenure, just like anyone else, need to be held accountable for their performance."
The "real reason" legislators want to end tenure, the NEA argues, is to save money. "And the real effect is to lower standards."
States generally spend 13 percent of their total budget on higher education, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. (About 25 percent goes to elementary and secondary education.) Revenue for colleges is raised through tuition, fees and donations.
"When a tenured professor retires or a new position is created, too often the new position is not put on the tenure track. ... Part-time faculty are not unqualified, but they are exploited. Most part-time faculty earn very low 'per course' salaries and few, if any, benefits."
Part-time faculty and adjuncts cannot advise students or contribute adequately if they are employed in various locations, the NEA says. It pointed to a national survey that said "one half of part-time faculty do not hold office hours or meet with students outside the classroom."
A paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research in 2013 -- "Are Tenured Track Professors Better Teachers?" -- reported that 57 percent of faculty were tenured. By 2009, that number had dropped to 30 percent.
Joerg Tiede, who oversees academic freedom and tenure issues for the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), points to the growing number of administrators and their increased salaries as another reason why state legislators want to decrease tenured professors and their salaries.
A 2013 survey of administrators' salaries by the College and University Professional Association for Human Resources (CUPA) showed that the chief executive officer (CEO) of a university system is paid an average of $388,000. For a CEO at a single institution within a campus system, the pay was on average $290,000.
Tenure became a practice after World War Two, but may professors lost their jobs in the 1950s and ‘60s after expressing political beliefs. The U.S. Supreme Court boosted tenure in 1972 as a legally binding contract between a teacher and her or his institution that requires a lengthy and complex process to break.
Do you have a story about tenure at your institution? Please leave a comment here, and visit us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and LinkedIn, thanks!
See all News Updates of the Day
‘College Deserts’ leave many communities without higher education options
“College Deserts” – areas where high schools are located more than 30 miles away from the nearest community college – leave large groups of people unable to pursue higher education because of transportation problems, Lexi Lonas Cochran writes in The Hill.
Most college deserts are in the Southern U.S., with a recent study in Texas showing that long commuting distances discourage many potential students from attending college. (December 2024)
Analysts say rate of college closures likely to increase
If current trends continue, the rate of college closures is expected to increase, according to a new study reported in Forbes.
Closures are more likely to affect private institutions, and while the number of closures might seem small on a national level, it could cause serious problems for the smaller and mid-sized communities where those colleges are located. (December 2024)
Judge upholds racial considerations in US Naval Academy admissions
Although the U.S. Supreme Court last year decided that civilian colleges and universities could not consider race or ethnicity in admissions, a judge ruled that the U.S. Naval Academy had established a national security interest in a diverse officer corps.
That means the academy – and other military service academies – can continue to consider race. A similar policy at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point has also been challenged, but that case has not yet gone to trial, according to a report in Navy Times. (December 2024)
Harvard recommends gap year as a strategic move
While some students and parents see the gap year as a waste of time, others see the break in academic studies as valuable for developing maturity, earning money or focusing goals.
MSN.com explains some of the reasons why Harvard – and other prestigious schools in the United States – are recommending that students take a gap year. (December 2024)
Student dilemma: Financial aid applications can expose undocumented parents
Many students in the U.S. rely on financial aid to attend colleges and universities, but as Julia Barajas reports in LAist.com, the Free Application for Federal Student Aid could cause a dilemma for students with an undocumented parent.
If students fill out the application, they will share their parents’ financial information – and potentially raise questions about their immigration status -- with the federal government. If they don’t fill out the application, they won’t get federal financial aid. (December 2024)