Hu Xijin, the former editor-in-chief of China’s state-run tabloid Global Times, has gone silent on social media for a week after his analysis of China’s economic policies triggered a backlash from Chinese state media and other prominent commentators.
Hu, a prominent nationalistic commentator known for his outspoken style on social media, has not shared anything on any of his social media accounts, including the microblogging site Weibo, Chinese messaging app WeChat and X, formerly known as Twitter, since July 27.
His silence comes after his July 22 WeChat opinion article pointing out that the Communist Party had left out a key phrase, “state sector is the mainstay of the Chinese economy,” from the resolution on reforming the Chinese economy adopted by China’s top leadership during the Third Plenum, a closed-door conclave that laid out key economic policies for the next five years.
He claimed that the move, which deviates from the Communist Party’s usual practice of reiterating the slogan in official documents, shows that China is hoping to “achieve true equality between the private and state-owned economy.”
Hu’s comments in the article, which has since been removed from WeChat, triggered widespread criticism on Chinese social media outlets, as some conservative commentators accused him of misinterpreting the resolution, which vowed to “consolidate and develop the state-owned economy.”
In addition to online criticism, China’s state-run People’s Daily also published an opinion article on July 30, reiterating that China’s fundamental position on the state and private sectors has not changed and will not change in the future.
The party “will be able to inject a surging impetus into the promotion of Chinese-style modernization by adhering to and perfecting the basic socialist economic system, promoting stronger and better state-owned capital and state-owned enterprises, and creating a favorable environment and providing more opportunities for the development of the nonstate sector of the economy,” the article said.
Bloomberg News reported that Hu has been banned from posting on social media, citing an anonymous source, but in a brief response to Hong Kong’s Sing Tao Daily, Hu refused to elaborate on his unusual silence.
“Personally, I don’t want to say anything. Just read what’s on the internet. Please understand,” he told Sing Tao Daily.
Some analysts say the incident reflects the Chinese government’s attempt to tighten control over discussions and narratives about China’s economy, which remains sluggish despite the government’s plan to roll out reform following the plenum.
“As the Chinese economy gets into a more precarious situation, the leadership in China becomes increasingly aware that it is a source of instability, so they decide to double down on control over economic and business information,” Dexter Roberts, a nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council's Global China Hub, told VOA by phone.
Other experts say Hu’s silence, which departs from his usual outspoken style on social media, also shows that he has crossed the line by publicly contradicting party policy.
“His comments have crossed the red line set up by the Communist Party, and the severity of the punishment, which is an outright ban from posting on social media, sends a warning to the rest of China that authorities have zero tolerance for opinions that deviate from the official line,” said Hung Chin-fu, an expert of Chinese politics at National Cheng-Kung University in Taiwan.
In his view, while the resolution mentioned the goal of expanding China’s private sector, development of the private sector still needs to be guided by the party, which means that the state sector will still play a dominant role in that process.
“China’s top leadership will allow some discussions on the development of its private sector, but they don’t want those voices to overshadow the official narrative,” Hung told VOA by phone.
Some analysts say Hu’s silence on social media may be a result that is in line with existing laws in China. “The new Chinese Communist Party Disciplinary Regulations explicitly forbids people like Hu from jumping the gun like he did,” Wen-ti Sung, a political scientist at Australian National University, told VOA in a written response.
While Hu is unlikely to face a total ban on social media, Roberts said, he may become more careful when commenting on topics related to the Chinese government’s policies or sensitive domestic issues in the future.
“There is less and less tolerance for outspoken people like Hu in China these days, so I don’t think something like this [can] happen to him without there being longer-term repercussions,” he told VOA.
Sung said Hu’s case also shows the growing risks Chinese people, including those working for the Communist Party, face when commenting on sensitive issues.
“Hu’s episode probably speaks to how hard it is to know where the red line is for anyone engaging in public political discourse in China today — even for a real insider like Hu, who worked in the party’s propaganda system for 28 years,” he said.
